Many classic literary ghost and horror stories pretend to be manuscripts left by mysteriously-disappeared narrators, who often let their pens drop in mid-sentence as the monster comes to get them. But, in a way, it's a shame this micro-budgeted picture has received so much attention for its unusual production history and comes to the UK after success of blockbusting proportions in the US, since it's the sort of film that gets its best effects by creeping up on you unawares and whispering scary things in the dark.
The blair witch project 2016 review movie#
That's crazy for a movie made with a $60K budget. (Apparently, some people actually thought they had all died.) On the other hand, it sounds like total torture for the actors. In its way, it's brilliant because no one knew who these people were and the found footage aspect made it all the more believable. They played tricks and mind games and even blasted creepy children's voices through a boombox to add new layers of horror. The production team built the rock formations at night so the actors would wake up and react to them. The entire script was 35 pages long, and each of the three unknown actors was given individual instructions each day, instructions that the directors and producers intentionally designed to cause drama.
![the blair witch project 2016 review the blair witch project 2016 review](https://www.screendependent.be/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/Blair-Witch-4.jpg)
![the blair witch project 2016 review the blair witch project 2016 review](https://mastersfilmreview.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/blair-witch-2.jpg)
It is the “true story” of three strangers, picked to go into the woods, make a movie together, and have their lives taped, to stop being polite and start getting real. Like: The Blair Witch Project is essentially one big (fake) reality show. "Still," I thought, "the story could surprise me." It didn't, but I can see how it would have in 1999 because the internet was so young and found footage wasn't yet a gimmick.īut it's 2016 and the only things that did surprise me were the facts my boyfriend kept spitting out throughout the movie and that I read up on after. He had never seen it either, but we both knew about the movie's ending and all. My boyfriend, who hates scary movies and tried to get out of coming over that night, was there, too.
The blair witch project 2016 review free#
I watched the movie in my living room on an oddly free NYFW Saturday night. Turns out, I'm pretty desensitized. That, or The Blair Witch Project just isn't scary. While, on the one hand, too many similarities could be a problem for audiences wanting innovation over old tricks, but when those old tricks helped make the original Blair Witch Project one of the scariest films to ever be released, maybe that's a good thing.Īll of which is to say, having somehow lived under a rock for most of my life and never seen the 1999 movie, I decided it was time to watch all 81 minutes of it.
![the blair witch project 2016 review the blair witch project 2016 review](https://assets.mubicdn.net/images/film/2536/image-w1280.jpg)
It's gotten decent reviews so far Ben Travers says it's "downright inspiring" and The Verge says it delivers the same scares as the original and uses similar techniques in order to do so. This time around, there's a bigger budget and more experienced actors than the 1999 phenomenon. (See: critically acclaimed but not yet released La La Land.) This week, however, one of Hollywood's most original stories of the last couple decades, The Blair Witch Project, is getting the 2016 update. Even when a project isn't based on a book, play, or "real-life" event, it usually references other movies. Nothing is original in Hollywood anymore.